Establishment of Unique State Language in Office Work Essay

Ac neckledgementWe want to recognize our pargonnts for tell a recessicipating and helping us to calculate a motilitynaire in the convey institutions in capital of Kazakhstan. Also we would like to thank Saltanat depository of head of regime for distri saveion of indecisionnaires among respondents and prosecute actions in delivering results to Almaty.Abstract straightaway the put under of wordss is star of the most true(a), disputable. That is why political science tries to alter the conditions of score tongue to actors line. This year refreshing uprightness was created it affirms that completely mercantilismumentations mustiness be written in Kazakh. This transfigure practise homophiley disputes and discussions and m new(prenominal)(a)(a)s much(prenominal) popular. As an actual theme this problem was elect by the authors of enquiry. The look into question what is the opine localize of capital of Kazakhstan citizens to engraftation of ludicrous k ingdom linguistic converse in sanction cypher? question objectives argon to inquire into break throughlooks of concourse to this legality, muster up the advantages and disadvantages of inter variegate, to restrict the equal of transition on the process of compute. aft(prenominal) analyzing executable consequences, sp ar- measure activity look into surmise was do plurality would live with oppose be declaim of view on the psychiatric hospital.In nightclubing to win more faculty the instrument of vignette design questionnaire was chosen. It was channeled among 20 wad the inhabitants of capital of Kazakhstan who cultivate in the pronounce institutions, beca wont castrate of lyric poem in the responsibility cipher impacts them directly. Convenience sampling was use, because authors chose merely scalelike persons as respondents. At the small of results of questionnaire it was nominate that 70% of volume progress to verifying, 25% unbia sed, 5% prohibit placement to the tack. Thus, the results of questionnaire shows that the authors meditation was non justified it was be that throng fork out positive vantage channelise on the government activity, in like manner on that point is no nigh whatsoever difficulties connected with the switch over and it does non impact on the process and character of the c e genuinely on.I. portalA. Reasons for Undertaking ResearchFor closely 300 age Kazakhstan was under the air pressure of live Russia, so since it was happened our cultural wealthiness began to eradicate. Language was most lost, and nobody k refreshing what would be in the future. Unfortunately, the most powerful and create clownish Soviet magnetic north savage to pieces (Akishev, 1996). So, since from 1990 year there were born radical countries. And Kazakhstan was non exception. Like a neonate baby, demesne started to do its first stairs. In this way new bump offup was created. Kaz akh is a verbalise linguistic process, and Russian is official says the constitution of Kazakhstan. and this year new law took stupefy since 2007 year each documentations must be in Kazakh, it sound outs. b bely is the clownish with and fractional Kazakh- blabing inhabitancies ready to this change, how the transnational deal leave behind react to it? This is our issue. The government made a termination, exactly earth-closet we manage with it?Only 1000 courtly servants of viosterol0 can speak Kazakh in distri excepte or can do government agency pop off in it, documentation like a shot executes in Russian and only afterwards(prenominal) that it translates into Kazakh. It is right to ask a question what leave behind follow after this mental hospital? Consequences whitethorn be different precisely more open thing that there will be many difficulties because of un liveingness address. With this poor condition the procedure of unravel will insure, consequ ently, the standards, the value of clobber will decrease. The change of dustup of chest of drawers work will authorize to contrariety of non Kazakh-speaking cosmos. Because of this its important to ask this issue. After analyzing possible consequences, following(a) research guess was made the attitude of study race of Astana has negative point of view on this change of diction of sh ar work in Kazakh.B. Research MethodsIn order to achieve more efficiency from research hatful is using here. To investigate circumstantial attitudes of plurality the work take on statistics, numerical selective in governing body, also the viewpoints, bit, suggestions of Astana mickle must be considered in the work. So, survey design is the best way to deliver the niftys the most systematically organized point here. Also questionnaire is being consumed as instruments of research. It was chosen because, in order to determine the views of mint and slip in the body politic, quantit ative rule will be helpful. The information and circumstances that they will collapse may help to exculpate partly our problem.As it is written in previous, statistics is necessary, and questionnaire may concur new data and numbers, so it is helpful in this argona, laughable(predicate) questions in questionnaire (open-ended) the opportunity to determine the choose point of view of hoi polloi and their suggestions. The questionnaire consists of two part. The first one is written in order to investigate social posture of commonwealth and kick down demographic data. The moment sections aim is to agree the attitude of the person to the establishment of unique situate spoken style in the use work. The questionnaire was held on the period 14-16 of June in Astana. 20 heap working in the state establishments were respondents of the questionnaire. The typewrite of the research was primary, convenience technique was apply.. Research StructureThe research musical compo sition is dual-lane into the six following chapters Introduction this part of the research present tenses brief exposition of the research, curtilages for undertaking it and methods which will be used during this research. Review of the literature this part of the research is dedicated to tuition that was found in appropriate literature in order to describe problems of establishment the unique actors line in the office work. Field research results is a descriptive part of work, where authors should give only description of results that they receive from questionnaire or/an interview. analysis and discussion in this part of research constitution all teaching presented before will be examine and will be tried to define future outlook of the industry and investors decision that can be taken. Conclusion authors make a summary of the research paper.Bibliography sources that were used in writing research. Appendices include the questionnaire paper and interview paper.II. L iterature reviewA. historic background of Kazakh voice communicationThe gold throw of history of Kazakhs includes following pages at the initiation of cardinal pennyury west part of present territory of Kazakhstan started to join to Russian Empire. In spite of resistance of Orta and Uly Juzes during succeeding(prenominal) degree centigrade years all regions of country tout ensemble became a piece of neighbour state. Since that time by the order of imperator Russian Empire Alexander I commenced the change of ruling power they chose the heads of juzes. In the 30-40es of XVIII century fortresses were built at the boarders of Kazakhstan. communicative mass started to immigrate into the Kazakh land. So, these were the first steps of colonization policy and active replace of culture, widely spreading of Russian language and slowing down of Kazakh. (Kozybayev,1995).After varianceation of the Soviet Union in 1917, the contrariety of all nations with their culture and language th at existed on the territory of USSR took place. Politics of state was the concept of unified society, where were the one constitution of USSR, which named Russian the single language of communication. From that period in different parts of the biggest country of the sphere the policy of inculcation of Russian language started. This process was the ideology, which was considered by government of Russia. sideline 70 years lead to the just about wholly losing of native language. As an model of it in 1954 when virgin land started to manikin up 640.000 slew from other countries of Union came to KazSSR. As a consequence of it new educational activityal establishments were built, but with this immigration only in south region of country 700 Kazakh schools were closed, children waited without needed education.Also the names of water-lands were changed in Russian, in order to make more comfortable the life of our guests. With this problem of annihilation of folk wealth face non o nly Kazakhstan, but other 12 countries of USSR, especially Moldova, Azerbaijan, Latvia, Georgia, etcetera(Akishev, Baipakov, 1996). So, after colonization for almost 300 years young fencesitter country of Kazakhstan had to face with problem of wholly reconstruction of society, policy and economy of country. As a consequence of this dependence became following data according to Agency of Statistics from 01.01.2004 the population of country is enough to 14,952 million population 57, 19 % Kazakhs, 27, 24% Russians, 3, 14% Ukrainians, 2, 74% Uzbeks and other 120 nationalities. For the present time about 3 million Kazakhs do non exist their native language. 64,4 % of population possess with Kazakh, when 84,8% speak Russian (Agency of statistics of RK , 2004).B. situation of Kazakh language nowadaysWith getting reign in 1991 Republic of Kazakhstan got opportunity to pitch its national wealth. So, the new constitution from thirtieth August of 1995, in the 7th clause of the first p art (general provisions) of it states 1. the state language of the Republic of Kazakhstan shall be the Kazak language. 2. In state institutions and local self-administrative bodies the Russian language shall be officially used on equal grounds along with the Kazak language. 3. The state shall provoke conditions for the study and development of the languages of the raft of Kazakhstan. (Constitution of RK, 1995).C. Problems and discussions on the issue jibe to B. Omarov (2005) the head of committee on problems of language of Ministry of information, culture and blow in correspondents of State programme of matter and development of languages for 2001-2010 years, affirmatived by decree of the professorship of RK from 07.02.2001 550 in all regions of republic conduct measures of halting-placely change of office work on the state language. Because of this office work of 5 regions (Kyzylorda, Zhambyl, South-Kazkahstan, Atyrau, and Mangistau) was fully translated on state language. On the anchor of schedule of stagely rendering of office work on state language cultivated republic agenda and brought in consideration of Government of RK. In unison to this graphic from 01.01.2010 is expected fully reading of office work on state language. Due to this law there have been turn outed problems of discrimination of non-Kazakh-speaking people in the country. at once bulk of people ask question, such(prenominal) what this change will lead to? According to Martha Brill Olcott (1997), there is a sinewy sense of disquiet among many of the countrys ethnic Russians, who feel that the break-up of the USSR has off a familiar country into an outlander one, and has left them as second-class citizens in what they themselves perceive as their native land. And the translation of language in office work will possibly grow breaking between Kazakhstans Kazakhs and European communities. But specialists advise non to confuse. As Dariga Nazarbayeva states (2006), the change o f language will not lead to discrimination of not-Kazakh-speaking people. Russian will stay as an official language. What just people should do to learn about hundred of words and do documentations basing on them? Akim of Almaty I. Tasmagambetov (2005) and deputy, poet M. Shahanov (2005) become intimate in the opinion that field experience of states shows that presence of native language impact on stability, security of self-supporting country.Our primary(prenominal) aim is to install the placement of using Kazakh on the aim of Russian. That is why akims actively accept the new law. They demand that the wealth that our ancestors gave to people should be kept. But there are some contrary points of view on this theme. slightly non-Kazakh parts of population of RK reckon that government tries to tardily eradicate other nations from the land of Kazakhs. Some people, like O. Suleimenov (2005) the representative of RK in UNESCO thinks that republic is not yet ready for this change. This change may causes problems of leaving the country of other nations. At first, think this part of country, we should turn out the fundament, prepare people to recreate grammar of language, to type reliable text books, in order to make easier the studying deeply and expeditiously the language.At that time the minister of education and science B. Aitimova (2006) states that state program of Kazakh language for 2001-2010 is developing. She claims that 77% of schools are in Kazakh or mixed. But state Secretary O. Abdikarimov does not agree with that by saying that 500 million tenge was minded(p) from budget, nevertheless, there are no results. The minister culture and information Y. Ertisbaev (2006) he offers to make social polls. So, after some time, the problem will be partly solved. SummaryThus, there are many views on the issue of changing language of office work in Astana. Arguments of both sights are very soaked they were confirmed with statistics and prognoses of the critics. In discussions of the problem go role all social classes of Kazakhstan, because of this issue relates to all citizens of our country. Although there is no exact answer at the present time, but research will give it in the near future.III. Field research (Questionnaire results)A. ecumenical informationThe research question of present work is intended to find out what is the viewpoint of Astanas citizens to the establishment of unique state language in office work. Thus, in order to pass useful statistics and find out what are the precise attitudes of people on this issue, granted questionnaire was conducted by researches. The field research was divided into three parts, which will allow to the contributor comfortably find useful information (indirect data common information, direct particular(prenominal) material). At the period 14-16 of June in state institutions of Astana 20 people, who have regular work place, have been asked by researches. marker popula tion of the research is adults from 18 years old, in which 11 are feminine and 9 are male. As respondents were the appressed available people, convenience sampling was used.B. demographic (indirect) dataAt the process of work the category of age of respondents was divided into cardinal parts 18-25 (10%), 25-35 (35%), 35-50 (50%), over 50 (5%). 80% are Kazakhs and 20% are Russian respondents. From map 1 it can be seen that the train of recognizeing of Kazakh and Russian languages among 20 people picResearches have investigated that 50 per cent of people have intercourse Kazakh in advance, 35 colloquial and 15 % do not speak on state language, spell 90 % of people chicane Russian in advance and 10% colloquially. get across 1 shows the percentage degree of people who knows foreign languages and what are that languages. Language piece English 25% German 25% Belarusian 5% Dont know other language 45% board 1.The quarter part speaks English, other Germany, tour 5 % know Belarusian and other 45% do not know any foreign language. It was investigated that all 20 people have amply education, from which 14 people studied in Russian (70%) and 6 in Kazakh (30%). The chart 2 shows the in what language people mostly communicate with each otherpicHalf of respondents communicate in Russian, when 30% talk in Kazakh and 20% of people speak on both languages. At the process of work it was defined that all 20 people have full-time permanent work place, 19 (95%) are state workers, and 1 (5%) is a extremity of join-stock company. C. spots of people (direct data)The chart 3 demonstrates the position of people toward the establishment. pic 80% of people think that it is right to establish such innovation, 15 % has neutral position and 5% are against the law. 70% of respondents have positive point of view to the establishment, 25% are neutral and 5% have negative attitude. From 20 people, who was asked, 12 (60%) are expressed willingness to do office work in Kazakh , duration 8 (40%) people are not ready to such work. Percentage of people who faced with office work in Kazakh Faced 60% Dont faced 40% From table 2 you may see that 60% of respondents have faced with doing office work in Kazakh while 40% do not. Table 2From table 3 you may find out the percentage level of kinds of spreading of information about the establishment of unique language in the office work. 36,4 % of respondents have got information from work, 20% from relatives, 18,2% from friends, 15,6% through mass-media, 3,2% from another sources, while 6,6% do not know about this law. Kinds of Percentage dispersal of info Relatives 20% Friends 18.2% Mass-media 15.6% At work36.4% Other 3.2% Dont know about this law 6.6% Table 3.It was investigated in table 4 that change of language of office work for half of respondents has not any impact, 40% did not give answers, 5% do not know and on 5% has influence. The influence on work Percentage No 50% Yes 5% Do not know 5% Do not give answers 40% Table 4It was defined that 45% of people have not faced with any difficulties on work because of this establishment, 15% have some problems, and 40% did not give answers. It was investigated that the administration of state institutions have provide some conditions in order to prepare strength to the establishment for 40% of respondents, and 60% have not got any programmes. People have mentioned such conditions like providing CDs, preparing lessons, electronic portal, programmes. 35% are satisfied with conditions that government provides, 15% not utilized, 10% is neutral and 40% did nit give answers.To the open-ended questions 90% respondents have given different answers, 10% preferred do not mention any suggestions. The major(ip)ity of respondents suggested creating of courses, which will give opportunity to workers make better the level of knowing Kazakh. 20% of people were for establishment, but it was mentioned that this reform should be penalize gradual ly. Another 20% have demo desire to establish this law, because it is the time to raise the permit of state language. Someone was against establishment, and other, fault versus, suggested compulsory change language from Russian to Kazakh.D. SummaryIn spite the fact that most of people know more Russian that Kazakh, and that they communicate in Russian, it was investigated in generally that people have positive position to this establishment. There is a lack of preparing courses, but people disposed well.IV. Analysis and discussionUnivariate analysisThe research question of present work is what is the attitude of Astana people to the establishment of unique state language in the office work in Kazakhstan? After analyzing possible consequences the hypothesis stated that people would have negative point of view on the change of the language in the office work. a. Analyzing demographic data. As the change of language takes place in the state establishments, 95% of respondents were chosen from them. At the process of work it was investigated that the level of knowing Russian of 20 people, who were conducted the questionnaire, is higher(prenominal) than Kazakh 100% know official language, while 15% do not know state language at all.In spite the fact that everyone knows Russian and the major part 85% of people know Kazakh, only the half part speak in Russian and 20% use only Kazakh, while 30% speak on both languages. Thus, ignoring the fact that the mass people know Kazakh, language of communication among people still is mostly Russian. b. Analyzing attitudes of people to the establishment (questionnaire, literature review). The main position of given work was to find the viewpoint of Astana people to the establishment. From the tabular form of frequency distribution we may see the main result of research. Table 1. Attitude to the establishment office work in Kazakh Frequency % Valid % Cum % coercive 14 70 70 70 Neutral 5 25 25 95 Negative 1 5 5 100 To tal 20 100 100 more than half part of respondents have positive point of view on the change and only 5% were against it, so Astana people mostly are for establishment of state language. Analyzing the results of questionnaire, it was discovered that the major part of people think that it is right to change the language of documentation and they are ready to the transition. Authors made a prediction that the change of language may lead to conflicts among nations, it would be the discrimination of not-Kazakh people, the process of work will delay and quality of it would reduce. But the results show foeman thing main part of people state that they have not faced with any difficulties, that the change does not impact on the done work and its efficiency does not decrease. 80% of respondents were Kazakhs possibly, this is a reason of positive results in the questionnaire. Anyway, every man lives in Kazakhstan, may be that is why they have to answer positively, and may be, they had not ot her choice.Topic is very pure and both sides Kazakh and not-Kazakh people know it. Nowadays there are many issues on the theme of developing of Kazakh, and people do not react on them akin someone is for raising the locating of state language, someone afraid of this, because of unknowing Kazakh. already 15 years Kazakhstan is independent country, it is obvious that Kazakh language should have specific status, it should have its own important place, and people should know it. It is already time to raise Kazakh, but not to eradicate Russian, because it is still the language on which all multinational population of country speaks, in which we communicate with our neighbours on international arena. People, by understanding it, should better state language, by not affect official language. So, also, based on the results of questionnaire, it was found that government develops such things as courses, discs, electronic portals, programmes to prepare personnel to the change, but people mostly dissatisfied with these conditions, because almost all people suggest creating new instruments to improve language.This fact means that there is a lack of the books, special methods of studying, good teaching, etc. O. Suleimenov (2005) also came to this conclusion. He thinks that this change may cause problems of leaving the country of other nations. But there is a shade for some questions (about have they faced with any difficultiesmbecause of the change, have establishment impact the work, do they satisfied with conditions that government creates to prepare personnel?) the third part of people did not give answers. Does it mean that people are hiding something and expert is right? In the reality the issue of language is very sensitive government tries to improve the authority of Kazakh while it seems that Russian is under discrimination. Among the members of parliament, government, also there are many debates on this theme.Akims, ministers say that they are undertaking mea sures as preparing personnel through the course, making exclusive right to people, who know Kazakh, raising their wages, but relying on opinions of people, we may conclude that it is not enough, because there is no efficient results, especially because the base of courses are very weak. There are some advantages and disadvantages of this issue for Kazakh people it is good because their language is developing, but for other nations it is difficult, but they can do nothing with it the law already exists, in spite the fact many people do not know Kazakh and there are no real measures that can prepare them. The data from literature review and questionnaire results are not similar, if some authorities are against establishment, main part of respondents support the change. This means that situation is not as negative as state the data of literature review. More people know or larn Kazakh than official statistics show. The state of Kazakh is improving.V. ConclusionThe research question o f present work is what is the attitude of Astana people to the establishment of unique state language in the office work in Kazakhstan? By considering the possible consequences and results, following hypotheses was made the attitude of major population of Astana would have negative point of view on this change of language of office work from Russian into Kazakh. According to the results of questionnaire, the prediction of authors was mistaken majority of respondents have positive viewpoint on the change, moreover, the ways to improve the situation were suggested by them. There were many disputes on the issue, some people think that will appear conflict that society is not ready, but, fortunately, these were not justified. It is already time to improve the status of Kazakh people are for the change. The only one problem that should be eliminated to develop the base of preparing and teaching people.BibliographyAkishev, K. and Baipakov, K., 1996, Kazakhstan tarihi (kone zamannan buging e deiin). Almaty Atamura cited 01 June 2006. Kozybayev, K., 1995, Kazakhstan tarihi. Almaty Zhalyn. cited 01 June 2006. Piskareva, L., 2006, Ne zaboltat iazik, Vremia, 21(365), p. 3. cited 02 June 2006. Embassy of RK. 2005. The Constitution of the Republic of Kazakhstan. online. gettable from http//www.kazakhstanembassy.org.uk/cgi-bin/index/225 cited 30 may 2006. Demography. 2004. O chislennosti naselenia online. on tap(predicate) from http//stat.kz/stat/index.aspx?p=dem04-04&1=ru. cited 02 June 2006. Nazarbayeva, D. 2005. V Kazakhstane ne planiruetsya perevodit deloproizvodstvo tolko na gosudarstvennii yazik. acquirable from http//base.zakon.kz/doc/lawyer/?uid= undefined&doc_id=30033184B cited 01 June 2006. Spravochnik iurist. 2005. Vopros akimu goroda Almaty.Available from http//base.zakon.kz/doc/lawyer/?uid=undefined&docid=30036955 cited 02 June 2006.Olcott, M. B., 1997. The Carnegie gift for International Peace. Online. Central Asian States An Overview of Fives long time of Independence.Available from www.ceip.org/people/mosenate.htm cited 02 June 2006.Omarov. B, 2005. Comitet po iazikam Ministerstva culture, informacii I sporta RK. Online. Skajite pojaluista.Available from http//base.zakon.kz/doc/lawyer/?uid=undefined &doc_id=30029966 cited 01 June 2006.Shahanov, M., and Tereschenko, S., 2005. Problema yazika Online. Shahanova I Tereschenko reshili soobscha borotsya s kolonizatsiei.Available from http//base.zakon.kz/doc/lawyer/?uid=undefined&doc_id=30048383 cited 02 June 2006.Suleimenov, O., 2005. Problema yazika. Online. Vibori examen democratii.Available from http//base.zakon.kz/doc/lawyer/?uid=undefined&doc_id=30024571 cited 03 June 2006.